AAPL stock: $442.93 ( 0.00 ) *Cached every 60 seconds. For live updating, Click Here |
| Tips and Deals ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
| Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: Dennis S
Date: March 27, 2012 04:59PM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: Chakravartin
Date: March 27, 2012 05:17PM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: August West
Date: March 27, 2012 05:19PM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: (vikm)
Date: March 27, 2012 06:03PM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: Ombligo
Date: March 27, 2012 06:27PM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: Racer X
Date: March 27, 2012 07:36PM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: JoeH
Date: March 27, 2012 08:19PM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: Lux Interior
Date: March 28, 2012 04:22AM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: MartyStickle
Date: March 28, 2012 07:06AM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: mikebw
Date: March 28, 2012 07:52AM
|
| Re: Incredible fact #463: No two shuffled decks of cards have ever been in the same order - ever Posted by: Blankity Blank
Date: March 28, 2012 01:59PM
|
I'd bet a buck or two that there are one or two close up magicians that could do it within a reasonable number of tries.Quote
mikebw
The number of possible sorting orders is certainly very high, but given that many new decks start out in the same order then the chances that the first one or two shuffles could have the same result (given the same shuffling operation) seems quite high.

