advertisement
Deals | News | Forums

 

AAPL stock: $445.15 ( +3.01 )

*Cached every 60 seconds. For live updating, Click Here

You are currently viewing the 'Friendly' Political Ranting forum
The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: $tevie
Date: May 16, 2012 09:31AM
From a person who knows whereof he speaks:

[www.nybooks.com]



"Stop thinking about art works as objects, and start thinking about them as triggers for experiences." ~ Brian Eno
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: beagledave
Date: May 16, 2012 10:08AM
Quote
$tevie
From a person who knows whereof he speaks:

[www.nybooks.com]

Interesting read, thanks for sharing that.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: cbelt3
Date: May 16, 2012 10:09AM
Not surprising. Most people have a world view that might stretch back to their grandparent's time, but rarely before that.

I was very amused the other day to point out that eight US Presidents were not 'born Americans', and two were born as dual nationals. The recipient of this information had been explaining his stance with regard to 'those damn illegal immigrants taking all of our social security'. He also was corrected in that theory.

[en.wikipedia.org]

Political talking points do NOT make for good factual statements. In fact, often quite the opposite.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: Acer
Date: May 16, 2012 11:54AM
The author seems to see this as somehow relevant to gay marriage. Not sure that's so. The author adequately supports the thesis that the "sacredness" of marriage has been an evolving cultural thing. But every example discussed was a man-woman relationship.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: beagledave
Date: May 16, 2012 12:41PM
Quote
Acer
The author seems to see this as somehow relevant to gay marriage. Not sure that's so. The author adequately supports the thesis that the "sacredness" of marriage has been an evolving cultural thing. But every example discussed was a man-woman relationship.

Well one of the narratives used by folks who oppose same sex marriage is "Hey, marriage has been this enshrined sacramental institution for a bazillion years.....stop trying to mess with tradition!"

When it HASN'T been that, then their argument, not surprisingly, carries even less weight.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: $tevie
Date: May 16, 2012 01:14PM
Quote
Acer
The author seems to see this as somehow relevant to gay marriage. Not sure that's so. The author adequately supports the thesis that the "sacredness" of marriage has been an evolving cultural thing. But every example discussed was a man-woman relationship.

The "example"s were all one couple, his parents. His point was how silly and contrived the Church was regarding their relationship.



"Stop thinking about art works as objects, and start thinking about them as triggers for experiences." ~ Brian Eno
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: August West
Date: May 16, 2012 01:41PM
Quote

The "example"s were all one couple, his parents. His point was how silly and contrived the Church was regarding their relationship.

Agreed, and thanks for that article.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: cbelt3
Date: May 16, 2012 01:50PM
What many Catholics know, but won't freely admit, is that the whole 'no marriage after Divorce' is actually a precept to the medieval practice of paying for indulgences.

I have a beloved Uncle who married outside our faith. They had three wonderful children (my cousins, great folk all of them). And then she succumbed to the temptations felt by a stay at home mother with an overworking husband. She had an affair, and decided it was a better relationship than her husband. So they divorced.

A few years later he met a lovely lady, and they wished to marry. My Uncle gave a substantial donation to his Church along with a petition to annul the original marriage. The annulment was granted, and he and his second wife were married in the Church.

I never understood that. With the wisdom or cynicism of age, I recognize that the whole process centered around the money. The rest of it is just bafflegab to placate the faithful.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: $tevie
Date: May 16, 2012 01:59PM
Sadly, I think the Church (the corporate structure) is ALL about the money. There are people who manage to rise above it and serve the needy and the hurting and the lost, but for the most part the RC Church is no better than Bank of America or Lehman Brothers - in fact they are worse because BofA and LB weren't pretending to represent God.



"Stop thinking about art works as objects, and start thinking about them as triggers for experiences." ~ Brian Eno
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: JoeH
Date: May 16, 2012 04:35PM
Quote
cbelt3
...
A few years later he met a lovely lady, and they wished to marry. My Uncle gave a substantial donation to his Church along with a petition to annul the original marriage. The annulment was granted, and he and his second wife were married in the Church.

I never understood that. With the wisdom or cynicism of age, I recognize that the whole process centered around the money. The rest of it is just bafflegab to placate the faithful.

I had a different experience, and since no large donation was involved came to a different conclusion. My parents separated when I was about 8, my father retained custody of my siblings and me. The reasons for the separation I won't go into, but half a dozen years later my mother did file for divorce and was granted it. Several years later my father met my stepmother, I was best man at their civil marriage.

Now as far as my father and stepmother knew from talks with the parish priests, annulment was not possible and they were not able to get married in the church. But a few years later a new priest was assigned to the parish. He had served in the office of the diocese that handled requests for annulments, and advised my father that based on the reasons behind the separation and divorce an annulment was likely to be granted. No large donation was given, my father would not have been able to make one in any case. The annulment was granted, and my parents were able to be married in a church ceremony not long afterwards.

What I took from that situation was that many in the Catholic Church, including many priests, are unaware of what actually is church doctrine around marriage and divorce. In other cases I have since run into priests that I know are aware, and they will actively avoid giving the answer that annulments are possible in many situations. Money may "grease the wheels" for some, but that applies in many organizations besides churches.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: RgrF
Date: May 16, 2012 10:08PM
Which brings us full circle to the fact that any church or religion is entitled to set whatever restrictions it wants within it's own structure but should not allowed to impose those strictures on the community as a whole.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: michaelb
Date: May 17, 2012 08:01AM
The article is vaguely interesting, but I think it overlooks the more important historical point: marriage is the institutional ownership of women by men. However manifested or implemented, that is and was its core function in society.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: rjmacs
Date: May 17, 2012 08:07AM
Quote
JoeH
Quote
cbelt3
...
A few years later he met a lovely lady, and they wished to marry. My Uncle gave a substantial donation to his Church along with a petition to annul the original marriage. The annulment was granted, and he and his second wife were married in the Church.

I never understood that. With the wisdom or cynicism of age, I recognize that the whole process centered around the money. The rest of it is just bafflegab to placate the faithful.

I had a different experience, and since no large donation was involved came to a different conclusion. My parents separated when I was about 8, my father retained custody of my siblings and me. The reasons for the separation I won't go into, but half a dozen years later my mother did file for divorce and was granted it. Several years later my father met my stepmother, I was best man at their civil marriage.

Now as far as my father and stepmother knew from talks with the parish priests, annulment was not possible and they were not able to get married in the church. But a few years later a new priest was assigned to the parish. He had served in the office of the diocese that handled requests for annulments, and advised my father that based on the reasons behind the separation and divorce an annulment was likely to be granted. No large donation was given, my father would not have been able to make one in any case. The annulment was granted, and my parents were able to be married in a church ceremony not long afterwards.

What I took from that situation was that many in the Catholic Church, including many priests, are unaware of what actually is church doctrine around marriage and divorce. In other cases I have since run into priests that I know are aware, and they will actively avoid giving the answer that annulments are possible in many situations. Money may "grease the wheels" for some, but that applies in many organizations besides churches.

Annulments are decided by church tribunals (the forerunners to modern secular courts), and much like at court, the political and cultural climate informing judicial attitudes matters.

There are many reasons for annulment, and how 'lenient' or 'flexible' the Church is in handling petitions is a matter of discretion. There must ALWAYS be a legal (canon law) reason to determine nullity, however. For whatever it matters, both JP2 and Bennie openly spoke against easy annulments, arguing that they can lead to people not taking themselves and their obligations seriously.



rj
AKA
Vreemac, Moth of the Future
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: The Myth About Marriage by Garry Wills
Posted by: Rolando
Date: May 17, 2012 11:03PM
Quote
RgrF
Which brings us full circle to the fact that any church or religion is entitled to set whatever restrictions it wants within it's own structure but should not allowed to impose those strictures on the community as a whole.

I completley agree!

Quote
michaelb
The article is vaguely interesting, but I think it overlooks the more important historical point: marriage is the institutional ownership of women by men. However manifested or implemented, that is and was its core function in society.
Historically perhaps. Nowadays, in practice, its the woman who owns the man (or whoever makes more money) is beholden to the other, at risk of losing his life's earnings!



San Antonio, TX (in the old city)

"All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing."
-- Edmund Burke
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public." Theodore Roosevelt (1918)
Options:  Reply • Quote
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login