AAPL stock: $445.15 ( +3.01 ) *Cached every 60 seconds. For live updating, Click Here |
| Tips and Deals ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
| Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: cbelt3
Date: June 08, 2012 08:54AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 08, 2012 08:57AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Acer
Date: June 08, 2012 09:03AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: cbelt3
Date: June 08, 2012 09:09AM
|
Easy.Quote
Acer
Please explain how can you be liberal, socialist, communist, fascist and now royalist all at the same time.


| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Lux Interior
Date: June 08, 2012 09:16AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: mattkime
Date: June 08, 2012 09:37AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: decay
Date: June 08, 2012 09:59AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 08, 2012 10:15AM
|
Quote
Acer
Please explain how can you be liberal, socialist, communist, fascist and now royalist all at the same time.

| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 08, 2012 10:56AM
|
Quote
$tevie
So we ended up with this totally stupid fable about how "liberals" believed Obama was a "messiah", just another piece of propaganda to which many people in this country are so vulnerable.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 08, 2012 11:00AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Uncle Wig
Date: June 08, 2012 11:04AM
|

| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: swampy
Date: June 08, 2012 11:20AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 08, 2012 11:24AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Acer
Date: June 08, 2012 11:26AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: swampy
Date: June 08, 2012 11:40AM
|
Quote
$tevie
He said "we". The fact that the majority of the House wasn't interested in lending a hand is not, in fact, Obama's fault.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: mattkime
Date: June 08, 2012 11:47AM
|
Quote
swampy
Quote
$tevie
He said "we". The fact that the majority of the House wasn't interested in lending a hand is not, in fact, Obama's fault.
He had a majority in the House for two years and he still couldn't heal the earth, $tevie.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 08, 2012 11:57AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 08, 2012 12:17PM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: davester
Date: June 08, 2012 12:22PM
|

| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: mattkime
Date: June 08, 2012 12:29PM
|
Quote
davester
Compared to Bush he was a messiah. However, compared to other past presidents of the last couple of decades he was just so so. I don't know of any liberals that buy into the republican soundbite that Obama was a "messiah" or even close. This is purely a republican construct designed to denigrate democrats. Nothing more.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Black
Date: June 08, 2012 12:38PM
|
Quote
cbelt3
[www.cnn.com]
"A new Gallup Poll released this week found that President Obama's support among liberals was at its lowest point in seven months, although it's still a solid majority of 70%.
What's clear is that the liberals speaking out don't want a president, they want a king. Albeit a liberal king -- but still a king, who would be unrestrained by Congress as well as the checks and balances enshrined in our Constitution."
. . .
"To me, the liberals who are so very disappointed with President Obama either had unrealistic expectations for him, viewing him as a messianic figure who would magically solve all of our nation's woes, or simply refuse to grasp the reality of our American political system. In either case, the answer is: The problem is not Obama, it's you."
- - -
Well put, sir. And, as noted in the article, applies to all of us , regardless of political alignment.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Black
Date: June 08, 2012 12:40PM
|
Quote
davester
I don't know of any liberals that buy into the republican soundbite that Obama was a "messiah" or even close. This is purely a republican construct designed to denigrate democrats. Nothing more.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 08, 2012 12:57PM
|
Quote
Black
Quote
davester
I don't know of any liberals that buy into the republican soundbite that Obama was a "messiah" or even close. This is purely a republican construct designed to denigrate democrats. Nothing more.
^simple truth^

| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: August West
Date: June 08, 2012 02:08PM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Pam
Date: June 08, 2012 02:37PM
|
Quote
swampy
Obama in Messiah mode during the campaign of 2008...
"I am absolutely certain that generations from now we will be able to look back and tell our children that this is the moment we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs for the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on earth."
the lib's biggest fear is that Obama's own words and promises will be his downfall in November. And ther is so much to quote. So many promises broken.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: john dough
Date: June 08, 2012 03:30PM
|

| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Chakravartin
Date: June 08, 2012 03:37PM
|
Quote
davester
Compared to Bush he was a messiah. However, compared to other past presidents of the last couple of decades he was just so so. I don't know of any liberals that buy into the republican soundbite that Obama was a "messiah" or even close. This is purely a republican construct designed to denigrate democrats. Nothing more.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Ca Bob
Date: June 08, 2012 10:13PM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: swampy
Date: June 09, 2012 07:58AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Black
Date: June 09, 2012 08:26AM
|
Quote
swampy
The Republicans in the Senate? The Dems still have a majority in the Senate and control of which bills reach the floor. You cant blame it all on the Repubs.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: swampy
Date: June 09, 2012 08:50AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: john dough
Date: June 09, 2012 10:05AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: swampy
Date: June 09, 2012 12:17PM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Dennis S
Date: June 09, 2012 01:51PM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Lux Interior
Date: June 09, 2012 01:54PM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: Black
Date: June 09, 2012 10:42PM
|
Quote
swampy
Again, how do you illibuster a bill that doesn't even get brought to the floor for discussion? Harry Reid is the biggest obstructionist on Capital Hill. I assume that is because he doesn't feel he has support among his own party to defeat them.
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: swampy
Date: June 10, 2012 08:55AM
|
| Re: Liberals as secret Royalists ? Posted by: decay
Date: June 18, 2012 11:26AM
|

