AAPL stock: $442.93 ( +9.67 ) *Cached every 60 seconds. For live updating, Click Here |
| Tips and Deals ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Lemon Drop
Date: June 28, 2012 08:01PM
|
Quote
swampy
Medicare is wonderful if you can find a doctor that will accept it. My family physician of 40 years died in December 2010. It took me 9 months to find another family practice doctor who accepted Medicare. I was notified last winter that my breast surgeon was dropping all his Medicare patients effective 12/31/11.
Best of luck to you and your family finding doctors even if you have the best coverage money can buy.
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: lafinfil
Date: June 28, 2012 08:05PM
|

| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Dennis S
Date: June 28, 2012 08:15PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 28, 2012 08:19PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: billb
Date: June 28, 2012 08:25PM
|
Quote
Lemon Drop
Quote
wowzer
My concern is that RomneyCare has bankrupted Massachusets--one of the most wealthy states in the Union. If I were in a less wealthy state, I'd opt out...and hope that all of my less wealthy citizens would move to a neighboring state that accepts the Medicaid money.
[video.foxnews.com]
RomneyCare costs have risen over 600% in a few years. Wait until the fraud folks get access to ObamaCare, it will even be worse...
You might want to take a look at the facts instead of the Fox spin. Massachusetts health care reform has led to a state with the lowest rate of uninsured and lower premiums but more offered coverage by employers.
[www.mahealthconnector.org]

| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: swampy
Date: June 28, 2012 08:48PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Dennis S
Date: June 28, 2012 09:11PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 28, 2012 09:14PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: davester
Date: June 28, 2012 09:42PM
|

| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 28, 2012 10:30PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Grateful11
Date: June 28, 2012 11:02PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Black
Date: June 29, 2012 12:40AM
|
Quote
swampy
Medicare is wonderful if you can find a doctor that will accept it. My family physician of 40 years died in December 2010. It took me 9 months to find another family practice doctor who accepted Medicare. I was notified last winter that my breast surgeon was dropping all his Medicare patients effective 12/31/11.
Best of luck to you and your family finding doctors even if you have the best coverage money can buy.
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Pam
Date: June 29, 2012 08:12AM
|
Quote
swampy
I live in the boondocks of Florida 125 miles from the closest urban center. Not the kind of place that attracts young general practitioners. There are a number of specialists, but not the highly trained doctors you'd find at large urban hospitals so if you have anything out of the norm medically, or need special procedures you have to commute. The old country doctors are a dying breed. My family doctor for so many years was still bartering, in some cases, his services for chickens and fresh garden vegetables when he died. The few general practice/family doctors that remain are over worked and under paid. There are 4 listed on the phone book that serve 30,000 people. There are a couple nurse PAs that run clinics for doctors that are 60 miles away. It took six months, but I finally got an appointment with one of two local doctors that were accepting new Medicare patients.
You guys in the big city will soon be facing the same scenario. Like I say, good luck.
A note to Dennis... There is no need for you to call me a liar and that's basically what you did. Please STOP it!
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 29, 2012 08:27AM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Pam
Date: June 29, 2012 09:15AM
|
Quote
Avenger
>>You can always move. It's a choice you can make.<<
Funny, I didn't see this prescription on the occasions we have been talking about post office closures in rural areas. Did you?
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 29, 2012 09:37AM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Ted King
Date: June 29, 2012 10:17AM
|
Quote
davester
On the other hand, the dissenting opinion is a politically charged mess, with divisive republican talking points like "tax and spend" sprinkled throughout. Thomas and Scalia in particularly should be drummed out of the court. They are incompetent idealogues (and Thomas is a crook to boot).
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 29, 2012 11:22AM
|
Quote
Pam
Quote
Avenger
>>You can always move. It's a choice you can make.<<
Funny, I didn't see this prescription on the occasions we have been talking about post office closures in rural areas. Did you?
Do you have a brain? People have made the decision to move out of rural areas for a host of reasons for a very long time. It's all about balancing the pros and the cons.
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Pam
Date: June 29, 2012 01:18PM
|
Quote
Avenger
Quote
Pam
Quote
Avenger
>>You can always move. It's a choice you can make.<<
Funny, I didn't see this prescription on the occasions we have been talking about post office closures in rural areas. Did you?
Do you have a brain? People have made the decision to move out of rural areas for a host of reasons for a very long time. It's all about balancing the pros and the cons.
So you have no problem for the Post Office to close their rural offices?
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Chakravartin
Date: June 29, 2012 07:33PM
|
Quote
Avenger
Quote
Pam
Quote
Avenger
>>You can always move. It's a choice you can make.<<
Funny, I didn't see this prescription on the occasions we have been talking about post office closures in rural areas. Did you?
Do you have a brain? People have made the decision to move out of rural areas for a host of reasons for a very long time. It's all about balancing the pros and the cons.
So you have no problem for the Post Office to close their rural offices?
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: Avenger
Date: June 29, 2012 08:50PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: wowzer
Date: June 29, 2012 09:10PM
|
Quote
Lemon Drop
Quote
wowzer
My concern is that RomneyCare has bankrupted Massachusets--one of the most wealthy states in the Union. If I were in a less wealthy state, I'd opt out...and hope that all of my less wealthy citizens would move to a neighboring state that accepts the Medicaid money.
[video.foxnews.com]
RomneyCare costs have risen over 600% in a few years. Wait until the fraud folks get access to ObamaCare, it will even be worse...
You might want to take a look at the facts instead of the Fox spin. Massachusetts health care reform has led to a state with the lowest rate of uninsured and lower premiums but more offered coverage by employers.
[www.mahealthconnector.org]
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: wowzer
Date: June 29, 2012 09:23PM
|
Quote
Dennis S
"I don't think it's nearly as bad as swampy says" does not equal "You're a liar."
I'll change it to: "I don't believe it's as bad as swampy says in much of the rest of the country."
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: wowzer
Date: June 29, 2012 09:25PM
|
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: wowzer
Date: June 29, 2012 09:35PM
|
Quote
Chakravartin
Nationalize the healthcare system, outlaw all medical care that doesn't come from the government and pass a universal service law to provide medical care to every household in the country.
Then we'll have a few things in common to compare doctors' offices with post offices.
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: RgrF
Date: June 30, 2012 01:38AM
|
Quote
$tevie
Quote
mick e
It appears that Roberts is turning into a leftist, and Scalia is none too pleased, as evidenced by his loony rant on the Arizona immigration case.
Right or wrong, it's nice to see Roberts making some independent decisions lately.
I'm not sure that moving towards the center is becoming leftist.
I believe that Roberts may be awakening to the nature of being a Supreme Court Justice - this is something we used to see back in the good old days as the justices would acquire an awareness of his/her solemn position and begin to make rulings based on the Constitution and not on someone else's agenda.
In short, Roberts may just be stepping up to the plate as a Supreme Court Justice in the finer traditions. I hope so.
| Re: Supreme Court PPACA decision Posted by: $tevie
Date: June 30, 2012 12:04PM
|
