AAPL stock: $442.14 ( +0.79 ) *Cached every 60 seconds. For live updating, Click Here |
| Tips and Deals ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
| contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: clay
Date: June 21, 2012 09:12PM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: mattkime
Date: June 21, 2012 09:20PM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: Chakravartin
Date: June 21, 2012 09:24PM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: davester
Date: June 21, 2012 09:25PM
|

| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: clay
Date: June 21, 2012 09:27PM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: clay
Date: June 21, 2012 09:31PM
|
Quote
davester
A 3x multiplier used to be common in the consulting biz but that is extremely rare these days. Figure you need to have at least a 1.5x multiplier to compensate for fringe benefits you now have to pay for (vacations, holidays, jury duty pay, unemployment insurance, health, life and disability insurance), then you need 7.5% of your billings to cover the extra employer FICA share that you'll now have to pay, then you will need to cover the cost of marketing your services, continuous education costs, office overhead, client default costs, and the time you spend not working while doing all that. For most consulting companies that comes out to about a total multiplier of about 2.2x. That is the absolute minimum you need to break even.
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: davester
Date: June 21, 2012 09:34PM
|

| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: Chakravartin
Date: June 21, 2012 09:44PM
|
Quote
davester
If you can only bill 20% of your hours then you're in the wrong business.
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: Mike Sellers
Date: June 21, 2012 10:21PM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: jdc
Date: June 21, 2012 10:24PM
|

| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: Carnos Jax
Date: June 21, 2012 10:59PM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: davester
Date: June 22, 2012 01:22AM
|
Quote
Carnos Jax
However, the going rate for a stress engineer as a contractor, with 10 years or more of experience is $70-$77/hr (and they usually work 40 regular hours a week and 8-16 hours of overtime a week at time and a half). Using the 2.2x multiplier someone suggested means this rate should be a little over $100/hr.

| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: Racer X
Date: June 22, 2012 01:24AM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: Mr645
Date: June 22, 2012 06:26AM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: cbelt3
Date: June 22, 2012 12:39PM
|
| Re: contracting vs. employee - how should hourly rates compare? Posted by: clay
Date: June 22, 2012 01:04PM
|
Quote
cbelt3
clay, ultimately it depends on what your customers are willing to pay. Your best research is to identify what the going rates are for people with your abilities in the area you are going to be working. THEN plan your negotiations accordingly. Knowing what you need to live on is a good thing, but it's more useful to ask the question "Should I work as a consultant or not ? ".
Also, it's critical to remember that you will *not* be working all the time. That's a big factor.

