Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Obama worse than Bush?
#1
“We are witnessing the bipartisan normalization and legitimization of a national-surveillance state,” Jack Balkin, a liberal law professor at Yale says. In his view, zealous leak prosecutions are consonant with other political shifts since 9/11: the emergence of a vast new security bureaucracy, in which at least two and a half million people hold confidential, secret, or top-secret clearances; huge expenditures on electronic monitoring, along with a reinterpretation of the law in order to sanction it; and corporate partnerships with the government that have transformed the counterterrorism industry into a powerful lobbying force.

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/...fact_mayer

Whistleblower charged with spying for disclosing financial waste, bureaucratic dysfunction, and dubious legal practices in N.S.A. counterterrorism programs.

Don't you feel safer now ..... didn't think so.
Reply
#2
This is a serious problem; thanks for the link.

Regarding your subject line question: point me to a President in living memory who has taken action to reduce executive power, and i will send you a cookie. The expansion of the security apparatus is a power win for the executive branch. Obama is doing it. Bush did it. Clinton did it. The explicit modern agenda to expand presidential power goes back to Nixon.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: