"Obama seeks to define Romney for voters"

[Black]

http://news.yahoo.com/isnt-marvelous-oba...48171.html


After watching quietly while Republican candidates fought each other, Obama is now trying to define his likely opponent in November as an out-of-touch multi-millionaire who would cut social programs for the elderly and the middle class while promoting policies to help the rich.

[Spock]

Romney an out-of-touch multi-millionaire who would cut social programs for the elderly and the middle class while promoting policies to help the rich.

Can't fault that description.

[OWC Jamie]

Oh my, here come the pots ....

[Black]

billb wrote:
Oh my, here come the pots ....

???



???



???

[mattkime]

billb wrote:
Oh my, here come the pots ....

See the previous thread. Stay on topic.

[$tevie]

I wish I was a multi-millionaire, mainly so that the pot-kettle reference made sense.

[Black]

$tevie wrote:
I wish I was a multi-millionaire, mainly so that the pot-kettle reference made sense.

Well, no need for extremes.

Just say this out loud:
"Don't vote for that rich guy who's only going to kow-tow to the wealthy-- vote for Obama!"
- and tell me if you don't feel a little silly.

Thanks for helping me sort out my feelings about this, guys.

[$tevie]

Well, then, it wasn't "here come the pots" it was "there goes the pot". And anyhow, the pot was calling the kettle white.

[cbelt3]

same Dem theme as last time.

[Lux Interior]

cbelt3 wrote:
same Dem republican theme platform as last time.

Republicans don't even try and hide it anymore. They are all about the "Job Creators" and trickle-down economics.

They don't want to feed the poor to the rich yet, but they are mostly apathetic to their situation.