Posts: 13,934
Threads: 1,261
Joined: May 2025
cbelt3 wrote:
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/07...?hpt=hp_t3
"(CNN)–A controversial billboard from a national Atheist group was scheduled to go up in a heavily populated Jewish neighborhood in Brooklyn on Tuesday but was bumped when the owner of the building objected to the advertisement."
If the lease agreement the owner of the building had with the billboard company says building owner can review the advertisements that would go up on his property and reject them if he wants, then that's that. But if the billboard company just acquiesced after the building owner objected then that still may be legal by the contract the atheist organization had with the billboard company, but it is more troubling.
I'm sure social conservatives will be complaining mightily that the atheists are having their religious freedoms trampled on. Not. It's a case of religious freedom clashing with property rights and it's not even close - property rights wins hands down. See, people very frequently have no problem favoring other rights and freedoms over religious freedoms - contrary to the impression you would have gotten from social conservatives recently.
Posts: 50,838
Threads: 670
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 23,743
Threads: 1,348
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
wonder if you'd ever see this written:
Although some in the Catholic community might not appreciate the outreach, American Atheists do have every right and every responsibility to advertise their organization and their movement as they see fit.
While I was at the site photographing the billboard, I asked a few local people what they thought of the billboard in their neighborhood. None of them wanted to be identified but they all told me they were not happy about it. They told me they felt it was disrespectful and insulting but they agreed that the American Atheists have the right to put up their billboards where they want.