jdc wrote:
If its just for storage, in the grand scheme of things... would it really matter?
Well, I'm working primarily with 4k ProRes 422 footage. When you're talking about several layers/multi-cam footage, scrubbing through the timeline, exporting master videos that are in the 100gb range, I'll take whatever speed benefits I can get. I'm easily saturating the SATA bus when working off of one of my SATA SSD's. I don't think I'm fully maxing out the NVME bus when exporting from/to one of those drives, but it is sure a good bit faster than SATA SSD.
jdc wrote:
its an XPG, still rated 3500/3000 MB/s RW and 5 year warranty...
I haven't done a ton of recent research to see the difference between the 8100 and 8200, other than that at some point I saw some difference/inferiority with the 8100 and I guess wrote that one off as an option. Again, if I'm spending multi hundreds on a quality NVME, I want to get whatever's widely regarded as the best/most reliable options.
jdc wrote:
Have you seen the new Rocket and 980 that are doing 7000/5000 RW?
Of course, you prob need a new motherboard for that.
Yeah, have seen those. My mobo won't take advantage of those yet. I'm pretty happy with this current gen of NVME and the boost it represents over SATA SSD. When the time comes, I'm sure I'll upgrade to the PCI 4 boards and look at the faster drives.
jdc wrote:
Is your NAS slow? Seems as tho even when I copy a few hundred GB from my 8200 to my RAID 0 it doesn't take all that long... but its via USB 3, not ethernet.
No, it's not slow. I'm mostly saying that I need to keep my current project data on my local drives until those projects are done, then I stick them on my NAS. It's a matter of simply not having enough local fast storage to keep all my projects at my fingertips. This fall has been crazier than normal with video work, and I'm finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. I'm sure my disk configuration will be more than adequate once I can get a couple projects off my plate.