Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Contemplating hardware upgrades. Thoughts?
#1
I'm going to be getting back into video editing more, just as a hobby. I'll probably go with Final Cut Pro. I would just run it on my Hac, but the recent FCP update requires 10.11and it's difficult to get this machine past 10.10.

This machine has an original i5, built in late 2009. The SSD has been upgraded once (Samsung 830) and the video card as well (GTX 660 OC). It's seen a RAM upgrade or two as well (four slots FTW.) Overall, it's still a decent machine. But getting a seven year old mobo and CPU to run the latest macOS is likely impossible.

I could buy a new mobo, CPU and RAM for about $500. It'd take a few hours to reconfigure and get it all setup. I don't have a lot of extra time anymore.

Thinking of getting a new MacBook Pro. 15", but at $2400-2800, I'm not so sure. An iMac is also an option, I suppose. But my monitors are currently wall mounted and I prefer that setup. I might get a new monitor as well, but have greatly preferred not having the monitor tied to the machine.

Comparing the benchmarks and specs on the new MBP video card (eg Radeon Pro 455), the one I have in my Hac currently smokes the MBP pretty well across the board. Of course, FCP is likely optimized better for the Radeon, so I'm not sure what the final results would be.

As far as storage goes, these projects will be pretty small. I can move them off to my server when I'm done. So 512GB in a MBP would be fine. Of course, if I use my Hac, I have plenty of storage in it.

I also use Adobe CS6 on this machine. Plus these days I have a second user on here that my wife uses. I also boot it into Windows and occasionally play games, but it would be okay if that came to an end.

What say ye?
Reply
#2
Just leaving the hack out, if you dont need portable, but were contemplating $2500 -- then 27' 5K iMac and mount it.

Although at this date, waiting for the 2017 model is probably smart.

Not the most glamourous, but $35

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...3BG2EN8103&ignorebbr=1&nm_mc=KNC-GoogleMKP-PC&cm_mmc=KNC-GoogleMKP-PC-_-pla-_-Accessories+-+Monitors-_-9SIA3BG2EN8103&gclid=CjwKEAiAsMXBBRD71KWOh6fcjRwSJAC5CNE1Z7tBEvx0NZdXwDYPjkEFTR4lnu23fuX80pGDdKyiBhoCCOnw_wcB&gclsrc=aw.ds
Reply
#3
but have greatly preferred not having the monitor tied to the machine.

You could save a bundle getting a Mini with the specs you need. Is it just about portability that you want a laptop?
Reply
#4
2009 Mac Pro flashed to a 2010 and install dual 6 core processors. Move your drives and video card. Should be able to get it done well under $800, possibly at $500.
Reply
#5
This, this, a thousand times this. Add an ssd on a pcie card, or an ahci sata card, and it will be ridiculously fast.

C(-)ris wrote:
2009 Mac Pro flashed to a 2010 and install dual 6 core processors. Move your drives and video card. Should be able to get it done well under $800, possibly at $500.
Reply
#6
2009 Mac Pro flashed to a 2010

What does this mean? I've flashed a phone before but not a computer. Just curious...
Reply
#7
Hey there's no "I'm M A V I C" choice on that poll...

oh, wait...
Reply
#8
DP wrote:
but have greatly preferred not having the monitor tied to the machine.

You could save a bundle getting a Mini with the specs you need. Is it just about portability that you want a laptop?

Minis are not quad core again, right? I have a hard time thinking it's dual cores and graphics would be enough.
Reply
#9
C(-)ris wrote:
2009 Mac Pro flashed to a 2010 and install dual 6 core processors. Move your drives and video card. Should be able to get it done well under $800, possibly at $500.

Had no clue that was an option. Where can I find more info on that?
Reply
#10
M A V I C wrote:
[quote=DP]
but have greatly preferred not having the monitor tied to the machine.

You could save a bundle getting a Mini with the specs you need. Is it just about portability that you want a laptop?

Minis are not quad core again, right? I have a hard time thinking it's dual cores and graphics would be enough.
Up to 3.0GHz dual-core Intel Core i7 processor
Turbo Boost up to 3.5GHz


Just looked it up. Dual core is the best you can get. Sorry!
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 10 Guest(s)