AAPL stock: Click Here |
|
Tips and Deals ---- For Sale & Free Items ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: honu
Date: May 28, 2006 07:32PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: Jp!
Date: May 28, 2006 08:00PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: honu
Date: May 28, 2006 08:38PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: D-Rod
Date: May 28, 2006 09:37PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: incognegro
Date: May 28, 2006 10:03PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: DaviDC.
Date: May 28, 2006 10:09PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: mikebw
Date: May 28, 2006 11:25PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: Racer X
Date: May 29, 2006 12:07AM
|
About half of the vacuums in the Consumer reports buying guide have bags, so it's not like you have to look very hard if you want a vacuum with a bag.Quote
incognegro
what effin' genius decided bagless was a good thing? i've never gotten as dirty as i do when emptying the bagless vacuum.
<br />
<br />
the old Kirby (bagged) is heavier, but overall cleaner to operate.
<br />
<br />
can we please have our bagged vacuums back?
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: Buzz
Date: May 29, 2006 02:34AM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: spacescape
Date: May 29, 2006 08:56AM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: RAMd®d
Date: May 30, 2006 12:34AM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: Robo
Date: May 30, 2006 05:11PM
|
Re: OT: Dyson vacuum followup. Thanks folks.
Posted by: Racer X
Date: May 30, 2006 10:51PM
|