AAPL stock: Click Here |
|
Tips and Deals ---- For Sale & Free Items ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
email attendant
Posted by: bazookaman
Date: October 30, 2015 07:16AM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: Onamuji
Date: October 30, 2015 07:49AM
|
Quote
bazookaman
...we wanted to have something like our receptionist that does the same thing for emails. If your email address ends with @companyxyz.com forward to this person. If it ends with @companyabc forward to this person. If someone is not there or if it's an "unknown" domain than it forwards to the next person in the queue. And so on and so on.
Does that makes sense? This was a lot more writing than I planned.
Re: email attendant
Posted by: Drew
Date: October 30, 2015 07:55AM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: bazookaman
Date: October 30, 2015 08:17AM
|
Quote
Onamuji
Quote
bazookaman
...we wanted to have something like our receptionist that does the same thing for emails. If your email address ends with @companyxyz.com forward to this person. If it ends with @companyabc forward to this person. If someone is not there or if it's an "unknown" domain than it forwards to the next person in the queue. And so on and so on.
Does that makes sense? This was a lot more writing than I planned.
You want a service running on your email server that 1. recognizes when people set out of office messages; 2. compares senders to a list; and 3. forwards messages to other accounts based on that list?
That's a heck of a custom job. Expensive.
Here's what we do at my office: We have public and private email accounts.
The public account is a distribution-list account that uses our whole names before the @ symbol. Messages to this account are forwarded to BOTH the employee and his/her manager. The manager figures out what to do when the employee is unavailable and a response is necessary.
The private accounts are the actual email accounts for us and only people in the organization have this email address. Messages to this account go straight to the employee's inbox.
Re: email attendant
Posted by: Onamuji
Date: October 30, 2015 08:25AM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: bazookaman
Date: October 30, 2015 08:42AM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: testcase
Date: October 30, 2015 10:11AM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: C(-)ris
Date: October 30, 2015 10:30AM
|
Quote
testcase
"apparently our customers are morons"........![]()
I always thought it was a business' job to service and take care of customers......![]()
In your company, it obviously works the opposite way.
Re: email attendant
Posted by: bazookaman
Date: October 30, 2015 10:57AM
|
Quote
testcase
"apparently our customers are morons"........![]()
I always thought it was a business' job to service and take care of customers......![]()
In your company, it obviously works the opposite way.
Re: email attendant
Posted by: jdc
Date: October 30, 2015 11:48AM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: bazookaman
Date: October 30, 2015 11:55AM
|
Quote
jdc
Can you build a rule that makes the email reply with the OOO message and then it forwards to the receptionist?
That seems pretty simple to me...
Re: email attendant
Posted by: Paul F.
Date: October 30, 2015 12:26PM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: TLB
Date: October 30, 2015 12:59PM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: jdc
Date: October 30, 2015 01:22PM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: C(-)ris
Date: October 30, 2015 02:20PM
|
Quote
jdc
Im sure you are aware of this, but email rules only take a few seconds to setup... adding a forward to a OOO should only take a few clicks...
Re: email attendant
Posted by: rgG
Date: October 30, 2015 02:56PM
|
Quote
C(-)ris
Quote
jdc
Im sure you are aware of this, but email rules only take a few seconds to setup... adding a forward to a OOO should only take a few clicks...
There are plenty of things that only take 1 click I can't get some people to do....
Re: email attendant
Posted by: Buzz
Date: October 30, 2015 03:04PM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: jdc
Date: October 30, 2015 03:40PM
|
Re: email attendant
Posted by: TL
Date: October 30, 2015 04:35PM
|