advertisement
Forums

The Forum is sponsored by 
 

AAPL stock: Click Here

You are currently viewing the Tips and Deals forum
Apple.Patent.Infringe
Posted by: NewtonMP2100
Date: November 08, 2017 06:19AM
....by Corephotonics.....in iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 8 Plus....


Corephotonics Sues Apple Over Dual-Lens Cameras in iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 8 Plus

.....Corephotonics, an Israeli maker of dual-lens camera technologies for smartphones, has filed a lawsuit against Apple this week alleging that the iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 8 Plus infringe upon four of its patents.

The patents, filed with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office between November 2013 and June 2016, relate to dual-lens camera technologies appropriate for smartphones, including optical zoom and a mini telephoto lens assembly.

• U.S. Patent No. 9,402,032
• U.S. Patent No. 9,568,712
• U.S. Patent No. 9,185,291
• U.S. Patent No. 9,538,152

Corephotonics alleges that the two iPhone models copy its patented telephoto lens design, optical zoom method, and a method for intelligently fusing images from the wide-angle and telephoto lenses to improve image quality.

iPhone X isn't listed as an infringing product, despite having a dual-lens camera, perhaps because the device launched just four days ago.

Corephotonics showed off some of its technologies at Mobile World Congress last year. In particular, it demonstrated software capable of combining the images of two separate camera lenses to create a more detailed picture, including the ability to optically zoom up to 5x with no moving parts.

Corephotonics, founded in 2012, describes itself as a pioneer in the development of dual camera technologies for mobile devices. The company's founders, led by Tel Aviv University professor Dr. David Mendlovic, have decades of experience in the fields of optics and miniature digital cameras.

In its complaint, a copy of which was reviewed by MacRumors, Corephotonics said one of its first acts as a company was to contact Apple. Despite receiving "many encouraging reports" and "positive feedback" from the iPhone maker, the companies never reached a license of any kind.

As one of its first acts as a company, Corephotonics reached out to Apple in the hopes of establishing a strategic partnership. Corephotonics received many encouraging reports and positive feedback from Apple about its technology, but the parties never concluded a license to the Corephotonics technology.

Corephotonics said Apple proceeded to release the iPhone 7 Plus with a dual-lens camera in September 2016, and has been willfully infringing upon its patents since that time. Corephotonics says Apple has knowledge of its patents, one of which the iPhone maker allegedly submitted as prior art in a patent application.

Corephotonics even claims Apple's "lead negotiator" said it "would take years and millions of dollars in litigation" before Apple might owe anything.

In fact, after one failed effort to negotiate a license, Apple's lead negotiator expressed contempt for Corephotonics’ patents, telling Dr. Mendlovic and others that even if Apple infringed, it would take years and millions of dollars in litigation before Apple might have to pay something.

It's worth noting that Apple acquired another Israeli camera company, LinX Imaging, back in 2015. LinX also specialized in creating multi-aperture camera equipment for mobile devices, and Apple presumably incorporated some of its technologies into the iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 8 Plus cameras.

Corephotonics is seeking damages of an amount to be proven in a jury trial, plus permanent injunctive relief. The complaint was filed with a U.S. District Court in Northern California, where Apple is headquartered.


Peggy.....sued.......Got Married......?!



_____________________________________

I reject your reality and substitute my own!



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/08/2017 04:43PM by NewtonMP2100.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: 'Dual' in the Sun?!....Apple sued for patent infringement over iPhone DUAL-lens camera.....
Posted by: C(-)ris
Date: November 08, 2017 09:44AM
2013 to 2016 for the patents? I'm going to hazard a guess and say that Apple has prior work from before the company was even founded. From what I understand Apple spends about 5 years moving from an idea to a finished product.



C(-)ris
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Throwback Thursday Signature:
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: 'Dual' in the Sun?!....Apple sued for patent infringement over iPhone DUAL-lens camera.....
Posted by: Billybob
Date: November 08, 2017 01:38PM
Quote
C(-)ris
2013 to 2016 for the patents? I'm going to hazard a guess and say that Apple has prior work from before the company was even founded. From what I understand Apple spends about 5 years moving from an idea to a finished product.

Prior development is not a defense to patent infringement unless Apple can show that the patent holder had access to Apple's research in developing its technology.

Apple's best strategy is to challenge the patents' validity or eligibility.

Of course, Apple can attempt to bleed the plaintiffs to death by running up their litigation costs, but how would that be ethical?

smiley-rpg028 smiley-gen081



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/08/2017 01:39PM by Billybob.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: 'Dual' in the Sun?!....Apple sued for patent infringement over iPhone DUAL-lens camera.....
Posted by: NewtonMP2100
Date: November 08, 2017 01:59PM
....amen, brother....



_____________________________________

I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: 'Dual' in the Sun?!....Apple sued for patent infringement over iPhone DUAL-lens camera.....
Posted by: C(-)ris
Date: November 09, 2017 09:57PM
Quote
Billybob
Quote
C(-)ris
2013 to 2016 for the patents? I'm going to hazard a guess and say that Apple has prior work from before the company was even founded. From what I understand Apple spends about 5 years moving from an idea to a finished product.

Prior development is not a defense to patent infringement unless Apple can show that the patent holder had access to Apple's research in developing its technology.

Apple's best strategy is to challenge the patents' validity or eligibility.

Of course, Apple can attempt to bleed the plaintiffs to death by running up their litigation costs, but how would that be ethical?

smiley-rpg028 smiley-gen081

I thought if they could prove that they had developed the technology before the patent holder applied for a patent they were safe. Keeps people from stealing others ideas and beating them to a patent app.



C(-)ris
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Throwback Thursday Signature:




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/09/2017 09:57PM by C(-)ris.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 81
Record Number of Users: 186 on February 20, 2020
Record Number of Guests: 5122 on October 03, 2020