I do not see why CNBC keeps having Cathy on as a commentator or quoting her. Her ARKK fund has not been consistent and poorly rated by Morningstar, etc.

Well, there’s that crazy guy Cramer. He generally gives good advice, if you do the opposite of what he says.

He’s entertaining. They’re in the entertainment business.

> He’s entertaining. They’re in the entertainment business.


This exactly. None of those stations are for news, though they occasionally report it.

If you want news, go to websites like AP Wire, Reuters, BBC World, etc.

---

Remember that Fecesbook has proven that hate engages people.

Someone in either advertising or management likes or agrees with what she says and/or thinks it will attract viewers.

---

In tha 360. MRF User Map

Cramer and Cathie Wood are opposites. Cramer gambles in 15min increments making fantastical claims predictions. Cathie Wood invests in 5-10 year windows. ARKK is their disruptive investment portfolio, so it is inherently unstable. She was an early adopter of TSLA and that has done VERY well for her, but she's had to trim her position because it's astronomical growth has caused it to become too big of a risk in the portfolio. I generally support her strategy, though I question some of the decisions periodically.

---

**************************************
MacResource User Map: [www.zeemaps.com]#