AAPL stock: Click Here |
|
Tips and Deals ---- For Sale & Free Items ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: pRICE cUBE
Date: August 05, 2023 05:38AM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference I’d most certainly dead now
Posted by: Ombligo
Date: August 05, 2023 06:08AM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference I’d most certainly dead now
Posted by: Speedy
Date: August 05, 2023 07:06AM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference I’d most certainly dead now
Posted by: DP
Date: August 05, 2023 07:39AM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: mattkime
Date: August 05, 2023 11:38AM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: Lemon Drop
Date: August 05, 2023 01:15PM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: btfc
Date: August 05, 2023 02:15PM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: Filliam H. Muffman
Date: August 05, 2023 04:07PM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: Ca Bob
Date: August 05, 2023 06:53PM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: pRICE cUBE
Date: August 05, 2023 07:09PM
|
Quote
Filliam H. Muffman
This seems like it was a battle of graft and corruption, and the PAC-12 brought a knife to a gun fight.
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: vision63
Date: August 05, 2023 11:01PM
|
Quote
Ca Bob
I grew up watching USC football (never went there, just rooted for them as a kid and kept with it). When I was working at a midwestern university, I was asked if I had ever been to a Rose Bowl game, and I explained that I had been to 17 of them. I think half the time it was USC, and other times I would just show up on game day and find a ticket for ten dollars or so. In the early days, the Big 10 was the top conference, and I remember Illinois and Dick Butkus defeating U of Washington. Then came an era where the coast was above the Big 10 and pretty competitive with everybody else, including the southeast, who were in the process of discovering that staying segregated was keeping them down. I think the current dominance of the SEC has done the job on the Pac 12. I can remember when USC and Notre Dame were the expected powerhouses, but it is no more.
I guess my question is why the Big 10 would even want UCLA. And there are the other second-rate west coast teams that have been absorbed into the Big 10. Why would they want them?
The case of Stanford is curious. It has become one of the top ranking academic institutions, particularly in biology, math, physics, and all of the humanities. Would it be better off dropping football the way Chicago did a century ago, or downgrading to a more academic condition, sort of like Ivy League football? The major problem I see with that is that it would affect Stanford's standing in rugby.
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: DeusxMac
Date: August 06, 2023 01:07PM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: bfd
Date: August 06, 2023 03:57PM
|
Re: The PAC-12 Conference is most certainly dead now
Posted by: AllGold
Date: August 06, 2023 10:36PM
|
Quote
Ca Bob
I guess my question is why the Big 10 would even want UCLA. And there are the other second-rate west coast teams that have been absorbed into the Big 10. Why would they want them?
Quote
Ca Bob
The case of Stanford is curious. It has become one of the top ranking academic institutions, particularly in biology, math, physics, and all of the humanities. Would it be better off dropping football the way Chicago did a century ago, or downgrading to a more academic condition, sort of like Ivy League football? The major problem I see with that is that it would affect Stanford's standing in rugby.