advertisement
Forums

The Forum is sponsored by 
 

AAPL stock: Click Here

You are currently viewing the Tips and Deals forum
serious moonlight
Posted by: Fritz
Date: November 29, 2023 03:59PM
this morning at 1am.





!#$@@$#!

Nolite manducare flavo.

Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: serious moonlight
Posted by: Carnos Jax
Date: November 29, 2023 04:14PM
Yeah, this full Moon’s been appearing brighter to me than usual as well.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: serious moonlight
Posted by: PeterW
Date: November 29, 2023 04:29PM
It’s the Beaver Moon.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: serious moonlight
Posted by: mrbigstuff
Date: November 29, 2023 07:09PM
did you dance?



High on a threshold yearning to sing
Down with the dancers having one last fling
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: serious moonlight
Posted by: freeradical
Date: November 29, 2023 08:26PM
Quote
mrbigstuff
did you dance?


I thought this was a David Bowie thread as well.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: serious moonlight
Posted by: Smote
Date: November 29, 2023 08:46PM
Quote
freeradical
Quote
mrbigstuff
did you dance?


I thought this was a David Bowie thread as well.

As did I.



"Defending your own life when in immediate danger to me is a basic right of each person. " Lemon Drop 11/17/2023 03:10 pm

Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: serious moonlight
Posted by: Stephanie
Date: December 02, 2023 12:00PM
Quote
Smote
Quote
freeradical
Quote
mrbigstuff
did you dance?


I thought this was a David Bowie thread as well.

As did I.

Me too!
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: serious moonlight
Posted by: Fritz
Date: December 02, 2023 12:04PM
damn! so did I !



!#$@@$#!

Nolite manducare flavo.

Options:  Reply • Quote
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 605
Record Number of Users: 186 on February 20, 2020
Record Number of Guests: 5122 on October 03, 2020