advertisement
Forums

The Forum is sponsored by 
 

AAPL stock: Click Here

You are currently viewing the Tips and Deals forum
Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: space-time
Date: May 01, 2007 04:47PM
"The compact external drive features a shock-resistant design and blue activity LED behild the front grille. It can exceed transfer rates of 80 megabytes per second using FireWire 800 and up to 1500 megabytes per second via eSATA."

Wow, I had no idea that eSATA is ~20x faster than FW800.

the quote is from [www.macworld.com]

nice product you got here, Larry!
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: The Grim Ninja
Date: May 01, 2007 04:54PM
eSATA isn't that fast.

eSATA is 150 MB/sec or 300 MB/sec
FW800 is 800 Mb/sec or 100 MB/sec

Besides, these are bus speed theoretical maximums. You'll probably never achieve that speed in real world testing.
Macworld sucks.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: weapon
Date: May 01, 2007 04:57PM
Theoretical or not, my video guy swears by the esata drives. esata was the only connection that could maintain the frame rates he needed while working from an external drive. Works well with the new macbook pro during road shoots.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: Filliam H. Muffman
Date: May 01, 2007 05:24PM
eSATA has a much higher theoretical speed. Neither comes within about 85% of the theoretical maximum but lots of drives have been bumping up against FW800 limits (about 76 MB/sec for a single drive).

Using multiplexing bridges, multiple SATA drives can be set up as a very fast RAID and does not show the inconsistencies that FW800 does.
[www.barefeats.com]



In tha 360. MRF User Map
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: Dubya
Date: May 01, 2007 05:32PM
OK... I'm confused....

"eSATA is 150 MB/sec or 300 MB/sec"

Which is it? 150 or 300?
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: M A V I C
Date: May 01, 2007 05:38PM
Quote
Dubya
OK... I'm confused....

"eSATA is 150 MB/sec or 300 MB/sec"

Which is it? 150 or 300?

Either. [en.wikipedia.org]




Help MacInTouch: Buy from Amazon? use this link [amazon.com]
Mac News & Info: [macintouch.com] [macnn.com] [tuaw.com]
Mac Benchmarks: [barefeats.com]
Used Mac Stuff [FS/T]: LowEndMac Swap List
Mac Software Updates: [macupdate.com]
Fonts: [dafont.com] [fontspace.com]
Online Computer Store With Mac Support: [macsales.com]
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: Lew Zealand
Date: May 01, 2007 05:39PM
It's both, there is a 150 MB/sec spec and a 300 MB/sec spec. Check your drives and interfaces.

And date codes! j/k
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: space-time
Date: May 01, 2007 05:59PM
it looks like the article is wrong then, perhaps they typed an extra 0 for the eSATA speed!
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: M A V I C
Date: May 01, 2007 06:27PM
Quote
space-time
it looks like the article is wrong then, perhaps they typed an extra 0 for the eSATA speed!

Yeah, the article is wrong. How it's wrong, I'm not sure, but one way or another it's wrong.

[eshop.macsales.com]
eSATA up to 3.0Gbps (300MB/s)

So if they thought the enclosure was only SATA (and not SATAII) then they thought it was 1.5Gbit... but that's not 1,500MB/s.




Help MacInTouch: Buy from Amazon? use this link [amazon.com]
Mac News & Info: [macintouch.com] [macnn.com] [tuaw.com]
Mac Benchmarks: [barefeats.com]
Used Mac Stuff [FS/T]: LowEndMac Swap List
Mac Software Updates: [macupdate.com]
Fonts: [dafont.com] [fontspace.com]
Online Computer Store With Mac Support: [macsales.com]
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Wow: eSATA vs Firewire 800
Posted by: OWC Larry
Date: May 01, 2007 09:22PM
Looks like they typoed! I just checked our actual release and data posted - that be correct. Macworld made a typo when they wrote their comment on our release.

Had me worried there for a moment.



OWC Larry
Other World Computing
[www.macsales.com]
Options:  Reply • Quote
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 164
Record Number of Users: 186 on February 20, 2020
Record Number of Guests: 5122 on October 03, 2020