... photographic or near photographic quality?

I'm thinking of ditching my Epson 1280. Nothing really wrong with it, I'm just thinking/wondering if it's time to make the shift to a color laser, now that some of them have really dropped in price; or if they're still not really up to snuff as far as photographic-level quality is concerned.

TiA

---

Freya says, 'Hello from NOLA, baby!' (Laissez bon temps rouler!)

I'm really, really happy with my Phaser 6180!

[www.office.xerox.com]

I don't do a lot of photo printing though. I'd say it's near-inkjet quality for the ones I have printed. Flesh tones are a bit weak; I'm sure that's fixable but I don't have the color knowledge to do it. The glossy toner looks great on plain paper.

You can request a free print sample to see the quality. The samples are professionally prepped, obviously, but are representative of what you can expect from the printer.

im gonna say "no"

no laser comes close

the only laser that i have read that sorta brags about its photo output is the dell 3100cn

---

Edited 999 time(s). Last edit at 12:08PM by jdc.