advertisement
Forums

The Forum is sponsored by 
 

AAPL stock: Click Here

You are currently viewing the Tips and Deals forum
Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: StingMe
Date: October 16, 2007 09:07AM
[www.apple.com]

Hmmm...wonder what the MHz requirement really means. No love for a G4/700 iMac or G4/800 iBook?

At least my/our off-lease G4 iBooks (1GHz) officially made the cut! grinning smiley
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: OWC Larry
Date: October 16, 2007 09:13AM
While that leaves a lot of Macs below the curve with soldered processors - a ton of Macs that are upgradeable and with a processor of 867MHz or faster in there vs. the a slower factory original - make the cut themselves all the same.

Said differently - those who have an investment in their Macs and want Leopard - no prob. Unless something drastic changes before Apple releases... but that would mean a major change (looking at system model profile instead of processor type/speed) to how it says yay or nay.

The limitation also seems to be just on the install with people reporting on the net installing on one PPC and then cloning the volume over to a non-qual system (g4s anyway..) and having no issue there either.



OWC Larry
Other World Computing
[www.macsales.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/2007 09:17AM by OWC Larry.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: JEBB
Date: October 16, 2007 09:15AM
And G3s, even the faster ones, are history.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: jdc
Date: October 16, 2007 09:28AM
and this is news?

i think this was discussed a few weeks ago

cutting out the G4 800 chip -- which had no L3 cache and ran closer to a 533 - was the main reason





Edited 999 time(s). Last edit at 12:08PM by jdc.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Chupa Chupa
Date: October 16, 2007 09:29AM
This kinda sucks:

Front Row requires a Mac with built-in IR and an Apple Remote.

I don't get why Apple doesn't sell a USB IR + Remote package. I've gotten a G4 Mac Mini to work fine w/ Front Row and a Keyspan iTunes remote.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/2007 09:29AM by Chupa Chupa.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: mattkime
Date: October 16, 2007 09:31AM
I'm pretty confident that XPostFacto will be updated to keep hardware compatibility at 10.4 levels.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Schpark
Date: October 16, 2007 09:48AM
What's the deal with the 1.6GHz requirement for DVD player!!!!!
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: cbelt3
Date: October 16, 2007 09:57AM
I'm actually amazed that Apple didn't start at the G5, or the Intel.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Numo
Date: October 16, 2007 09:59AM
The manufacturer's minimum hardware requirements aren't always realistic - what do you think the minimum processor speed and memory will be in order to run Leopard efficiently?
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: MEG
Date: October 16, 2007 10:06AM
Quote
jdc
\cutting out the G4 800 chip -- which had no L3 cache and ran closer to a 533 - was the main reason

Ahem, my Quicksilver dual 800 has 2MB of L3 cache per processor. It runs the betas of Leopard just dandy.

But, I imagine there are more of the models with the 800MHz sans L3 out there (i.e., the QS 2002 & iBook G4 800) that it was just simpler to make the minimum a higher number rather than attempt to differentiate.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: sekker
Date: October 16, 2007 10:11AM
yeah - the 1.6GHz DVD player requirement is for one reason - to cut out the older machines people are using for media players (like the original mac minis).
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Chupa Chupa
Date: October 16, 2007 10:11AM
Quote
Schpark
What's the deal with the 1.6GHz requirement for DVD player!!!!!

That is just for "improved" deinterlacing. You can still use DVD player w/ a less powerful machine.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Bill in NC
Date: October 16, 2007 10:19AM
2GB RAM

2GHz Core 2 Duo

Quote
Ammo
The manufacturer's minimum hardware requirements aren't always realistic - what do you think the minimum processor speed and memory will be in order to run Leopard efficiently?
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: mattkime
Date: October 16, 2007 10:19AM
>>The manufacturer's minimum hardware requirements aren't always realistic

Apple's are very realistic. They're typically based on running resource hungry iApps. If you just want email and web, your machine can be very underpowered according to apple specs and still be very responsive.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Monster
Date: October 16, 2007 11:12AM
no love for my Cube





The Taoist Zhuangzi said, "Good order results spontaneously when things are let alone".
The sociologist, and historian, Adam Ferguson described the phenomenon of spontaneous order in society as the "result of human action, but not the execution of any human design".
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: space-time
Date: October 16, 2007 11:58AM
Quote
Monster
no love for my Cube

who wants to love a Cube anyway? don't we all like curvy things?
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: GGD
Date: October 16, 2007 12:05PM
Quote
MEG
Quote
jdc
\cutting out the G4 800 chip -- which had no L3 cache and ran closer to a 533 - was the main reason

Ahem, my Quicksilver dual 800 has 2MB of L3 cache per processor. It runs the betas of Leopard just dandy.

But, I imagine there are more of the models with the 800MHz sans L3 out there (i.e., the QS 2002 & iBook G4 800) that it was just simpler to make the minimum a higher number rather than attempt to differentiate.

The 800MHz Titanium PowerBook G4 also has an L3 cache (1MB ), really hard to imagine how the extra 67MHz that the 867MHz TiPB has will make noticable performance difference.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/2007 12:06PM by GGD.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Chupa Chupa
Date: October 16, 2007 12:12PM
Quote
space-time
Quote
Monster
no love for my Cube

who wants to love a Cube anyway? don't we all like curvy things?

Only if they are these kind of curvy things:




As for the Cube it's still design genius in my book.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: RAMd®d
Date: October 16, 2007 12:36PM
...really hard to imagine how the extra 67MHz that the 867MHz TiPB has will make noticable performance difference.

It won't.

The purpose is to cut off some machines from Apple Support. There's more to it than the 67MHz. What that is and why, only Apple knows.

I'll try Leopard on my Cube, via an external drive though. But between the slow processor and now-paltry 1.5G RAM, it could be very slow. (But Panther ran surprisingly well on a 333MHz iMac.)






I am that Masked Man.

All you can do, is all you can do.

There’s trouble — it's time to play the sound of my people.

Your boos mean nothing to me, I've seen what you cheer for.

Insisting on your rights without acknowledging your responsibilities isn’t freedom, it’s adolescence.

I've been to the edge of the map, and there be monsters.

We are a government of laws, not men.

Everybody counts or nobody counts.

When a good man is hurt,
all who would be called good
must suffer with him.

You and I have memories longer than the road that stretches out ahead.

There is no safety for honest men except
by believing all possible evil of evil men.

We don’t do focus groups. They just ensure that you don’t offend anyone, and produce bland inoffensive products. —Sir Jonathan Ive

An armed society is a polite society.
And hope is a lousy defense.

You make me pull, I'll put you down.

I *love* SIGs. It's Glocks I hate.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: TLB
Date: October 16, 2007 12:38PM
Our IT department has set the bar a bit higher. No Leopard on work machines unless you have at least a G5 and 1GB RAM.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Paul F.
Date: October 16, 2007 01:24PM
I'd give it to miss Norway...



Take that sentence any way you wish.



Paul F.
-----
A sword never kills anybody; it is a tool in the killer's hand. - Lucius Annaeus Seneca c. 5 BC - 65 AD
----
Good is the enemy of Excellent. Talent is not necessary for Excellence.
Persistence is necessary for Excellence. And Persistence is a Decision.

--

--

--
Eureka, CA
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: mattkime
Date: October 16, 2007 02:00PM
>>Our IT department has set the bar a bit higher. No Leopard on work machines unless you have at least a G5 and 1GB RAM.

I'm always entertained by how various IT departments make decisions -

They have a policy for installing software which hasn't been released yet. I have a hard time believing it has anything to do with how well the software runs.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Buzz
Date: October 16, 2007 02:09PM
I understand the "support" aspect of having a minimum system requirement, but when an apparent requirement is arbitrarily speed based, it gets confusing in situations like the Quicksilver, where there are models that qualify and others that seem not to as originally shipped, and I don't see any clarification between single and dual processors... does an original single 933 upgraded to a dual 800 no longer qualify? does a dually count double MHz so a dual 800 is a 1.6GHz for requirement's sake? does an original single 800 OC'ed to 867 now qualify even w/o a L3? It seemed a lot easier when other specific hardware parameters were addressed; native USB/FW, entire processor class, specific video requirements, etc.. A processor speed w/in a processor class w/o additional specs required seems totally support based, not operationally based. Where is Apple going to draw the line? An original 733 w/ 1.2GHz dual proc upgrade is OK, but an 800 OC'ed to 867 isn't, because proc swap is a supported activity whereas OC'ing isn't for OS purposes on machines long out of h/w warranty? They're gonna have some 'splainin' to do...



Sometimes it is what it is...
and then there's times when it's really better.



==
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Chupa Chupa
Date: October 16, 2007 02:23PM
Keep in mind this is Apple we are talking about. They like to accomplish two two things w/ software:

1) Keep things simple so as not to overly confuse or frustrate the masses
2) Soft sell the masses to buy new hardware by putting it in their minds that they will be left behind.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: jdc
Date: October 16, 2007 03:10PM
A dual 800 = 1600, not 800

[forums.macresource.com]





Edited 999 time(s). Last edit at 12:08PM by jdc.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: Jimmypoo
Date: October 16, 2007 06:04PM
TARGET MODE BOOT -- Load OS, reboot.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Leopard System Requirements: 867MHz G4
Posted by: mikebw
Date: October 16, 2007 11:37PM
Yeah, I was kind of expecting the G5 1.6GHz to be the minimum, but then there was never a G5 powerbook, so all those G4 Powerbooks and iBooks that sold during the G5 era would be getting the shaft. The Intel procs haven't been out long enough for there to be a high enough percentage of users who own them.

As for Miss Norway...
Options:  Reply • Quote
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 65
Record Number of Users: 186 on February 20, 2020
Record Number of Guests: 5122 on October 03, 2020