This should be interesting.
Quote
"Defendants provide no reasons, let alone 'satisfactory reasons,' for the substitution of counsel," wrote District Judge Jesse Furman, citing upcoming deadlines.
"As this Court observed many months ago, this case has been litigated on the premise -- based 'in no small part' on Defendants' own 'insist(ence)' -- that the speedy resolution of Plaintiffs' claims is a matter of great private and public importance."
[
www.cnn.com]
I read something the other day speculating that the reason for the change in legal teams was that the original team refused to ruin their reputations and begin arguing that everything they said up to this point was "wrong".