ooopsie!

Top Pennsylvania court rebuffs Trump campaign's vote-count observation lawsuit

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Tuesday sided 5-2 against the Trump campaign in a lawsuit alleging that its representatives had been unlawfully deprived of an adequate opportunity to watch the vote count in the Democratic stronghold of Philadelphia.

The defeat was the latest in a series of disappointing rulings for the Trump campaign, whose slapdash legal effort has come nowhere close to overturning President Trump’s electoral loss, and has produced none of the systematic fraud that Trump and his allies have baselessly claimed to be the source of Joe Biden’s projected victory.

---

__________________________________
There’s a guy wearing overalls with no shirt.
Which I think we all know is the International uniform for the last guy you’ll ever see.

Rudy strikes out.

Quote
vision63
Rudy strikes out.

Cant strike out if you aren't in the game. Rudy was never even in the game

Wait until Rudy strikes again…

And it will be sooner than later.

Great, but who are G.D. slappies who voted that the case had merit?!

---

Quote
AllGold
Great, but who are G.D. slappies who voted that the case had merit?!

I had to look that up:

Quote

Slappy refers to a fictional evil ventriloquist dummy in the Goosebumps horror franchise.

Quote
Ted King

Quote
AllGold
Great, but who are G.D. slappies who voted that the case had merit?!

I had to look that up:

Quote

Slappy refers to a fictional evil ventriloquist dummy in the Goosebumps horror franchise.

You taught me something. My knowledge of the term comes from sports where slappies are mindless fans or sycophants.

---

Quote
AllGold

Quote
Ted King

Quote
AllGold
Great, but who are G.D. slappies who voted that the case had merit?!

I had to look that up:

Quote

Slappy refers to a fictional evil ventriloquist dummy in the Goosebumps horror franchise.

You taught me something. My knowledge of the term comes from sports where slappies are mindless fans or sycophants.

I'm a Lakers/Dodgers slappy by that definition.

For the past half-hour, attorney Mark Aronchick – representing PA counties being sued by Trump – has loudly torn into Rudy Giuliani, saying he is ignorant of the law, living in "some fantasy world" and pushing wild allegations that are "disgraceful in an American courtroom."

[twitter.com] Wapo

Entertaining recap by the lawyer who argued against Giuliani:

"The Trump campaign came in, through Mr. Giuliani, asserting a fantasy world,” says Mark Aronchick. “I sat there dumbfounded because the story presented by Mr. Giuliani bore no relationship to the actual complaint in the case.”

MSNBC video

---

Northern California Coast

Judge should just tell Rudy he's clearly too incompetent to represent the campaign properly before the court.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 11/18/2020 06:44PM by Bill in NC.

Rudy's latest 20K a day gem is forging a judges signature on an order Rudy submitted:

Effecting a federal judge's electronic signature on your proposed order at any time, and especially before he has ruled on your motion, is something I'd recommend against