[www.newsweek.com]

This guy is trying really hard to out-crazy Sidney Powell - and I think he's doing it! He posted this handy pamphlet on twitter:

"The algorithm was never designed for unheard of levels of GOP non-participation. The algorithm will steal votes from the GOP, but there will be so few in heavily Democratic precincts that GOP vote totals will go negative," the diagram states. "The fraud will be so obvious, SCOTUS can then invalidate the presidential election. Real conservative senators can then be appointed, after Kemp, Perdue and Loeffler's arrest."

"Listen to Lin and Sydney, and listen very closely to what the President says. His words ALWAYS have deeper meaning."

wow...

so these idiots sit around and listen for DEEPLY to Trumps words for the hidden messages - GREAT!



I'm sure that in the end, we will learn that Lin was a Dem plant and vision63's college roommate...

Do you see what we are having to put up with until Jan 5?


I wonder if they all go around playing old vinyl records backwards, too.
What a bunch of nut jobs.

---

Roswell, GA (Atlanta suburb)

Wow. So the algorithm will give a bit more than 10% fake votes, a bit more than 10% stolen votes, so about 20% of the votes should be thrown out, according to these ... people ... (I’m trying to be polite here). Any algorithm that has a greater than 20% error rate would not have been released for use. At least, most people would be ashamed of being associated with it, and would open themselves to all kinds of lawsuits directly tied to its use.

Just another example of someone’s wishes becoming their reality. The cognitive dissonance is staggering.

YEAH! We'll show those ChiCommies!

So he’s advocating Trump supporters to boycott the runoff, so that it may expose the fraud? The guy is bat @#$%& crazy, but I’m all for him to succeed in this!

Quote

...and vision63's college roommate...

I'd say he got the bad acid,

---

Quote
August West

Quote

...and vision63's college roommate...

I'd say he got the bad acid,

Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

Feeling very sorry for Georgians right now. It's like the entire Circus of the United States decided to send every clown car they could find to your state. Ugh! And, sadly - it seems like California is fueling many of the clown cars with huge infusions of cash.

[www.latimes.com]

Quote
L.A. Times & San Diego Union-Tribune
WASHINGTON — With early voting well underway and both sides expecting extremely close races, record amounts of money continue to pour into Georgia’s twin Senate runoff campaigns, including a large chunk of cash from donors in California, new Federal Election Commission filings show.

It'll all be over soon - hopefully. But the way things have gone this year, there's no reason to believe it will…

Meaning is way to deep for this Jayhawk.

He had donated to Democrats in the past. I’m sure most voters on the right are ignoring him. Only Pres. Trump could convince enough Republicans to not vote to make any real difference, otherwise the Democrats will lose by 5%.

---

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, where the weather is wonderful even when it isn't.

“ algorithm “

Isn’t that just a different word for socialism?

/sarc

Quote
vision63
Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

That's one of the attributes of Trumpism, there is no room for nuance nor is there any parsing of stated positions - once they step on that bus they're on for the full ride.

Quote
RgrF

Quote
vision63
Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

… once they step on that bus they're on for the full ride.

Quote
bfd

The future is fun! ... The future is fair! ... You may already have won! ... You may already be there!

---

In tha 360. MRF User Map

Quote
btfc
“ algorithm “

Isn’t that just a different word for socialism?

/sarc

Next, they will be claiming that the "algorithm method" of birth control is really a form of abortion.

Quote
vision63
Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

Agree to disagree. He's been a sleaze ball for a long time.

---

rj
AKA
Vreemac, Moth of the Future

Quote
rjmacs

Quote
vision63
Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

Agree to disagree. He's been a sleaze ball for a long time.

I can go yard on "anybody." Anybody. That would make "everyone" a sleaze ball and it would all be the truth.

Conversely, I can also defend anybody. Even Donald Trump. It would also be 100% truthful.

Narratives are fun.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/28/2020 05:57PM by vision63.

Quote
vision63

Quote
rjmacs

Quote
vision63
Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

Agree to disagree. He's been a sleaze ball for a long time.

I can go yard on "anybody." Anybody. That would make "everyone" a sleaze ball and it would all be the truth.

Conversely, I can also defend anybody. Even Donald Trump. It would also be 100% truthful.

Narratives are fun.

Sure, that's facile. But what exactly made him so highly respected?

---

rj
AKA
Vreemac, Moth of the Future

Quote
rjmacs

Quote
vision63

Quote
rjmacs

Quote
vision63
Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

Agree to disagree. He's been a sleaze ball for a long time.

I can go yard on "anybody." Anybody. That would make "everyone" a sleaze ball and it would all be the truth.

Conversely, I can also defend anybody. Even Donald Trump. It would also be 100% truthful.

Narratives are fun.

Sure, that's facile. But what exactly made him so highly respected?

He cut his teeth defending people maligned and libeled by mob ruled news organizations, corporations etc. If it wasn't for him, there would have never been justice regarding Richard Jewell. He has a long track record. He's a lawyer, so there's that. But his MAGA'ness is a big surprise.

Quote
vision63

Quote
rjmacs

Quote
vision63

Quote
rjmacs

Quote
vision63
Lin Wood used to actually be a highly respected attorney. He musta got into the bad acid.

Agree to disagree. He's been a sleaze ball for a long time.

I can go yard on "anybody." Anybody. That would make "everyone" a sleaze ball and it would all be the truth.

Conversely, I can also defend anybody. Even Donald Trump. It would also be 100% truthful.

Narratives are fun.

Sure, that's facile. But what exactly made him so highly respected?

He cut his teeth defending people maligned and libeled by mob ruled news organizations, corporations etc. If it wasn't for him, there would have never been justice regarding Richard Jewell. He has a long track record. He's a lawyer, so there's that. But his MAGA'ness is a big surprise.

Judgment and evaluation of the character of a human being should be observed from a position of objectivity. Consider the whole person. I don't see what's "facile" about that.

If I ever say someone is a POS, I can write down a long list of "proof" that my observation is the actual truth. That doesn't mean I'm going to forget what they've done that was worthwhile.

When I talk about Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, it's never a lie and I can back it up. When people talk about people like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, it's always a lie and they can't ever back it up.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/29/2020 01:12PM by vision63.

Quote
vision63
Judgment and evaluation of the character of a human being should be observed from a position of objectivity. Consider the whole person. I don't see what's "facile" about that.

If I ever say someone is a POS, I can write down a long list of "proof" that my observation is the actual truth. That doesn't mean I'm going to forget what they've done that was worthwhile.

When I talk about Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, it's never a lie and I can back it up. When people talk about people like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, it's always a lie and they can't ever back it up.

I think his efforts have long been aimed at curtailing the press, and he has effectively cherry-picked high-profile clients to keep himself in the public eye.

I'm not saying the man has never done any good. Cue the comment about a broken clock being right twice a day. I'm saying I think the ideology (which is extreme) that fuels his practice of law is dangerous, and he is a sleaze bag in how he pursues that ideology and its goals.

I'm trying to remember the times that you gave Trump and Bernie a fair shake, but perhaps that's my bias sneaking in...

---

rj
AKA
Vreemac, Moth of the Future




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/29/2020 01:48PM by rjmacs.

Quote
rjmacs

Quote
vision63
Judgment and evaluation of the character of a human being should be observed from a position of objectivity. Consider the whole person. I don't see what's "facile" about that.

If I ever say someone is a POS, I can write down a long list of "proof" that my observation is the actual truth. That doesn't mean I'm going to forget what they've done that was worthwhile.

When I talk about Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders, it's never a lie and I can back it up. When people talk about people like Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama, it's always a lie and they can't ever back it up.

I think his efforts have long been aimed at curtailing the press, and he has effectively cherry-picked high-profile clients to keep himself in the public eye.

I'm not saying the man has never done any good. Cue the comment about a broken clock being right twice a day. I'm saying I think the ideology (which is extreme) that fuels his practice of law is dangerous, and he is a sleaze bag in how he pursues that ideology and its goals.

I'm trying to remember the times that you gave Trump and Bernie a fair shake, but perhaps that's my bias sneaking in...

I've always have given both Trump and Bernie a fair shake.

I've given them both credit for being unbelievably focused and persistent in regards to their objectives. I just reject the narratives that others "assume" they possess.

The most important thing I do is ask people to express what they do or have done that's so impressive? They never do. Why is that? It's because, despite what they believe, they bought a bill for goods that don't exist. They literally can't even make a list of simple accomplishments that are meaningful.

People hear what they want to hear.