advertisement
Forums

 

AAPL stock: Click Here

You are currently viewing the 'Friendly' Political Ranting forum
Status of infrastructure legislation
Posted by: Ted King
Date: July 29, 2021 06:11PM
[thehill.com]

Quote

Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, raised serious objections Thursday to the nascent agreement between President Biden and a group of bipartisan senators, saying it does little to address climate change and that House leaders should alter the bill if it gets passed by the upper chamber.

DeFazio emphasized that there are plenty of outstanding questions surrounding the $1.2 trillion package, the specifics of which are still being drafted into legislative language. But based on what's been revealed, DeFazio said he has "tremendous concerns."

"At this point, it looks anemic at best on climate change," DeFazio told reporters just off the House chamber.

"The White House spun a number last night which is impossible: hundreds of billions for climate change. That totals more than what they're offering," he added. "I mean, there's a lot of spin coming out of the White House."

Behind DeFazio, the House passed a $715 billion water and infrastructure package earlier this month, with hopes that the Senate would use it as a template for their own proposal. But DeFazio has been harshly critical of the Senate process, saying negotiators in both the Senate and White House have dismissed some of the more transformative reforms featured in the House bill.

"I do not want to lock in the failed policies, the highway-centric policies, of the last century in a time of climate crisis," he said. "And I ... do not want to have a bill that does not deal with fossil fuel reduction from our largest polluter, which is transportation."

The acerbic Oregonian ticked off a host of his early concerns Thursday, saying the Senate proposal has more money for highways than his bill does, thereby encouraging more driving — a leading contributor of carbon emissions; it has less money for rail and other public transit; and it shifts funding away from wastewater and drinking water improvements to programs replacing some — but not all — of the country's lead pipes.

DeFazio is taking Biden to task for what he says is the president's misrepresentation of the Senate provisions.

"The president says this will deal with all the lead pipes. No. That's $45 [billion] to $50 billion, so it doesn't deal with all the lead pipes," DeFazio said. "And we have critical needs in wastewater and drinking water, so they shouldn't be taking money out of that.

"Other than that, there's very, very few details," he added. "So we'll wait for text."

A White House spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The concerns arrived just a day after the lead Senate negotiators — Sens. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and Rob Portman (R-Ohio) — announced that, after weeks of talks, they'd reached an agreement on an enormous package to bolster the nation's aging roads, bridges and water systems. Shortly afterwards, the Senate voted to advance the package, which is expected to feature $1.2 trillion for infrastructure projects over eight years, $550 billion of which will be new spending.

Given the fragility of the Senate talks — and the rarity of bipartisan consensus on major legislation in the polarized Congress — many Democrats are urging House leaders to stage a quick vote on the Senate package when it arrives in the lower chamber.

"Once the final infrastructure bill clears the Senate, the House should quickly take it up," Rep. Chris Pappas (D-N.H.) said Thursday in a statement.

Yet House Democratic leaders are in much less of a hurry.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has vowed repeatedly that the House won't vote on a bipartisan infrastructure bill before the Senate also passes a larger Democratic package of social and environmental programs — a strategy that pushes any House vote to late September, at the earliest.



e pluribus unum
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Status of infrastructure legislation
Posted by: Speedy
Date: July 29, 2021 06:21PM
Add the Green New Deal to the conciliation bill, then twist Sen. Sinema’s arm(s).



Saint Cloud, Minnesota, where the weather is wonderful even when it isn't.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 107
Record Number of Users: 186 on February 20, 2020
Record Number of Guests: 5122 on October 03, 2020