AAPL stock: Click Here |
|
Tips and Deals ---- For Sale & Free Items ---- 'Friendly' Political Ranting |
Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: deckeda
Date: January 11, 2022 03:12PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: deckeda
Date: January 11, 2022 03:20PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: deckeda
Date: January 11, 2022 03:22PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: Racer X
Date: January 11, 2022 03:29PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: Lux Interior
Date: January 11, 2022 03:31PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: deckeda
Date: January 11, 2022 03:34PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: Lux Interior
Date: January 11, 2022 03:35PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: davester
Date: January 11, 2022 04:17PM
|
Quote
Lux Interior
Quote
Racer X
And when things flip, they might wish they hadn't gotten rid of it. 2 sides to every coin.
What's to stop republicans from changing the rules when they take power anyway?
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: wave rider
Date: January 11, 2022 05:28PM
|
Quote
Brennan Center For Justice (wave rider bolds and bigs)
…
At times, the Senate has also exempted certain types of legislation from the cloture rule. For example, Congress’s annual budget reconciliation process requires only a simple majority vote and cannot be filibustered. Likewise, trade agreements that are negotiated using fast-track rules cannot be filibustered. Other exemptions apply to measures that involve, for example, military base closures or arms sales. In total, 161 exceptions to the filibuster’s supermajority requirement have been created between 1969 and 2014, according to an analysis by the Brookings Institution’s Molly Reynolds.
…
[www.brennancenter.org]
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: $tevie
Date: January 11, 2022 10:37PM
|
How to Reform the FilibusterQuote
After his encounter with Bunning, Franken called Ornstein to find a way to end the absurdity, and the result was this: flip the numbers from 60 required to end debate to 41 required to continue it, moving the burden from the majority to the minority. Require 41 to be on the floor at all times, and to debate the issue at hand, germanely. The minority could still prevail—the majority would have to stop all other business to go around the clock, and might decide after some time to cut its losses and move on to other issues, if the minority made its determination clear. But it would require a major effort by the minority to accomplish its ends. And for both sides, bipartisan compromise might be the best way to ease any mutual burdens.
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: RgrF
Date: January 11, 2022 10:42PM
|
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: Acer
Date: January 11, 2022 11:07PM
|
Quote
RgrF
So you're still opening his emails, eh?
Re: Biden live speech on filibuster
Posted by: $tevie
Date: January 11, 2022 11:20PM
|
As are you, obviously.Quote
RgrF
So you're still opening his emails, eh?