advertisement
Forums

 

AAPL stock: Click Here

You are currently viewing the 'Friendly' Political Ranting forum
Our racist former president
Posted by: Acer
Date: September 18, 2023 10:52AM
"Just a quick reminder for liberal Jews who voted to destroy America & Israel because you believed false narratives!" Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday during Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year and the start of the faith's High Holy Days.

"Let's hope you learned from your mistake & make better choices moving forward! Happy New Year."

[www.newsweek.com]
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Mr645
Date: September 18, 2023 11:09AM
Our former President, who supported Israel, who moved the US embassy to Jerusalem, who has stood behind the Jewish people for decades.

Compared to our current racist leader that sends money to terrorists, to Hamas and the Taliban.



"No Comment"
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Carnos Jax
Date: September 18, 2023 01:04PM
Quote
Acer
"Just a quick reminder for liberal Jews who voted to destroy America & Israel because you believed false narratives!" Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday during Rosh Hashanah, the Jewish New Year and the start of the faith's High Holy Days.

"Let's hope you learned from your mistake & make better choices moving forward! Happy New Year."

[www.newsweek.com]

Yup, crap like this and his support of white supremacists & nazis should leave no doubt of his fundamental racist nature. Of course the magats support him regardless, just like the invertebrates they are.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: DeusxMac
Date: September 18, 2023 01:29PM
"Tell Donald Trump to go to hell. He’s a race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot."
Lindsay Graham, December 2015
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Steve G.
Date: September 18, 2023 01:38PM
"If you play along maybe the Saudis will give you $2 Billion like they did for my Jew, Kushner."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 18, 2023 05:46PM
The "dual loyalty" anti-Semitic trope that Trump constantly pushes has resulted in the deaths of more Jews than any other blood-libel.

It is the main international anti-Semitic stereotype and was one of the pillars of the Nazi "final solution."



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 01:05AM
Quote
Tiangou
The "dual loyalty" anti-Semitic trope that Trump constantly pushes has resulted in the deaths of more Jews than any other blood-libel.

It is the main international anti-Semitic stereotype and was one of the pillars of the Nazi "final solution."

and it was made possible by no Right to Keep and Bear Arms!

"All too many of the other great tragedies of history — Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few — were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. See Kleinfeld Dissent at 578-579. If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars." 9th Circuit Court Judge Kozinski, born in communist Romania in 1950 [law.justia.com] This is a legal court document. about his family

"Kozinski was born in July 1950 to a Romanian Jewish family in Bucharest, under the rule of the Socialist Republic of Romania.[4] Kozinski's father, Moses, survived the Holocaust after spending four years in Transnistrian concentration camps where tens of thousands of Jews perished. His mother, Sabine, lived through the war years in a Romanian ghetto.[5]" from wikipedia.



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2023 01:16AM by Smote.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 19, 2023 06:38AM
Quote
Smote
Quote
Tiangou
The "dual loyalty" anti-Semitic trope that Trump constantly pushes has resulted in the deaths of more Jews than any other blood-libel.

It is the main international anti-Semitic stereotype and was one of the pillars of the Nazi "final solution."

and it was made possible by no Right to Keep and Bear Arms!

Have you no shame at all?



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Carnos Jax
Date: September 19, 2023 08:00AM
No sh|t, this trivializes the holocaust, if not borderline racist for mocking what happened to them!

This is the second time he’s made such a disparaging comment agains Jews. Not at all surprising and why I think he must be a troll from outside the forum, especially since I see these kind of comments constantly being made in gun nutters and white supremacist forums.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Speedy
Date: September 19, 2023 08:38AM
Quote
Smote
Quote
Tiangou
The "dual loyalty" anti-Semitic trope that Trump constantly pushes has resulted in the deaths of more Jews than any other blood-libel.

It is the main international anti-Semitic stereotype and was one of the pillars of the Nazi "final solution."

and it was made possible by no Right to Keep and Bear Arms!

"All too many of the other great tragedies of history — Stalin's atrocities, the killing fields of Cambodia, the Holocaust, to name but a few — were perpetrated by armed troops against unarmed populations. Many could well have been avoided or mitigated, had the perpetrators known their intended victims were equipped with a rifle and twenty bullets apiece, as the Militia Act required here. See Kleinfeld Dissent at 578-579. If a few hundred Jewish fighters in the Warsaw Ghetto could hold off the Wehrmacht for almost a month with only a handful of weapons, six million Jews armed with rifles could not so easily have been herded into cattle cars." 9th Circuit Court Judge Kozinski, born in communist Romania in 1950 [law.justia.com] This is a legal court document. about his family

"Kozinski was born in July 1950 to a Romanian Jewish family in Bucharest, under the rule of the Socialist Republic of Romania.[4] Kozinski's father, Moses, survived the Holocaust after spending four years in Transnistrian concentration camps where tens of thousands of Jews perished. His mother, Sabine, lived through the war years in a Romanian ghetto.[5]" from wikipedia.

So armed Jews in Europe could have held their own against the Wehrmacht? argh



Saint Cloud, Minnesota, where the weather is wonderful even when it isn't.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: JoeH
Date: September 19, 2023 08:51AM
Quote
Tiangou
Quote
Smote
Quote
Tiangou
The "dual loyalty" anti-Semitic trope that Trump constantly pushes has resulted in the deaths of more Jews than any other blood-libel.

It is the main international anti-Semitic stereotype and was one of the pillars of the Nazi "final solution."

and it was made possible by no Right to Keep and Bear Arms!

Have you no shame at all?

I would assume not, he and the judge are just repeating a standard false narrative that gunners keep putting forth. It ignores the realities of getting firearms in general, and the actual results of the Warsaw Ghetto uprisings. The Germans were more annoyed at the delay in transporting Jews away and closing out the ghetto than anything else, it had limited impact otherwise. Of the 50,000+ there at the beginning, about 13,00 were killed during the fighting and almost all of the rest were either executed there or at death camps shortly after. The main fighting was over in about 2 weeks, not nearly a month. The German and Polish auxiliary forces suffered a bit over 100 casualties, about 20 of those died. They did not keep track of casualties among their Jewish collaborators.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Acer
Date: September 19, 2023 09:07AM
We can't assume the circumstances of the successful American Revolution obtain for all peoples oppressed by a larger power.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Lux Interior
Date: September 19, 2023 09:55AM
Quote
Speedy

So armed Jews in Europe could have held their own against the Wehrmacht? argh

Exactly!

Just like Billy Joe Bob & Cletus are going to fend off the US military.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: DeusxMac
Date: September 19, 2023 11:37AM
Quote
Smote
9th Circuit Court Judge Kozinski, born in communist Romania in 1950...

...and Wikipedia goes on to report that...

"While he was in the Office of Special Counsel, despite staff recommendations against termination, Kozinski overruled his staff and then repeatedly tutored Interior Secretary James G. Watt's legal staff in how to rewrite the proposed termination of a mining safety whistleblower so as to pass legal muster. When the incident came to light years later during confirmation hearings for Kozinski's Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals nomination, the scandal drew 43 Senate opposition votes and reportedly subsequently prevented Kozinski's planned promotion to the U.S. Supreme Court."

"In an interview on CBS's 60 Minutes in April 2017, Kozinski talked about his support for the death penalty but with the reservation that death by lethal injection should no longer be used. He advocated the use of the guillotine or firing squad and said that for any country that wants to take human life, citizens should be prepared to watch the proceedings."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 12:18PM
His parents' experiences happened years before he was born. Are you saying his actions invalidate his parents'?

[encyclopedia.ushmm.org]



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 12:25PM
Quote
Acer
We can't assume the circumstances of the successful American Revolution obtain for all peoples oppressed by a larger power.

middle eastern insurgent tribes vs Russia? middle eastern insurgent tribes vs US? How did that work out? Where were their tanks, bombers and aircraft carriers? We had B-2 bombers, they had Toyota HiLux pickups. We had Tomahawks, they had RPG-7s and Stingers.

The Ukraine in the early days?

They all had the means to fight back.

Not everyone wins, but they have the chance to control their destiny. Didn't they deserve that, as human beings?



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2023 12:27PM by Smote.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: btfc
Date: September 19, 2023 12:30PM
How exactly did that work out?

You tell us…

So you want to turn the United States into Afghanistan, great idea!
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: JoeH
Date: September 19, 2023 12:38PM
Quote
Smote
His parents' experiences happened years before he was born. Are you saying his actions invalidate his parents'?

[encyclopedia.ushmm.org]

His actions invalidate him. As for being Jewish, and coming from that experience, that does not give him any special status or authority on the situation.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: DeusxMac
Date: September 19, 2023 12:41PM
Quote
Smote
His parents' experiences happened years before he was born. Are you saying his actions invalidate his parents'?

[encyclopedia.ushmm.org]

It’s HIS judgments and opinions at issue, NOT his parents’ experiences.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 12:41PM
Quote
btfc
How exactly did that work out?

You tell us…

So you want to turn the United States into Afghanistan, great idea!

you don't believe people should have the right to defend themselves?



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: btfc
Date: September 19, 2023 12:52PM
Ooh yeah
Aah

It's all part of my gun fondler fantasy

It's all part of my gun fondler dream

Yeah Yeah Yeah
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 01:05PM
Quote
btfc
How exactly did that work out?

You tell us…

So you want to turn the United States into Afghanistan, great idea!

[jewscanshoot.org]

some people feel differently



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 19, 2023 05:28PM
Quote
Smote
Quote
btfc
How exactly did that work out?

You tell us…

So you want to turn the United States into Afghanistan, great idea!

[jewscanshoot.org]

some people feel differently

You are despicable.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 05:49PM
Quote
Tiangou
Quote
Smote
Quote
btfc
How exactly did that work out?

You tell us…

So you want to turn the United States into Afghanistan, great idea!

[jewscanshoot.org]

some people feel differently

You are despicable.

for pointing out an opposing viewpoint?



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: RgrF
Date: September 19, 2023 05:59PM
...for using the Holocaust to make a cheap political point.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 06:11PM
safety and security for the Jewish people has been a priority for 3 millenia, it's nothing new [www.cnn.com]

" The problem, he said, is a too-common thread of the “narrative of the 3,000-year history of the Jewish people.”

“Almost everywhere we have existed or sought to make a life, there have been those that have not wanted us there or not wanted us to exist,” Masters said, adding that’s true of other faith traditions as well. “The fact that it exists in the United States at this time is deplorable.”



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 19, 2023 06:47PM
Quote
RgrF
...for using the Holocaust to make a cheap political point.

And one that perpetuates yet another anti-Semitic trope.

Yes.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 06:51PM
which one is that?



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 19, 2023 07:11PM
Quote
Smote
which one is that?

That Jews in Germany were cows or cowards and went willingly to the ovens without defending themselves as they could have if they didn't give up their guns.

Trivializing 6 million deaths to promote guns is really REALLY low. Doing so the way you're doing it is slimier than foot-fungus.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: JoeH
Date: September 19, 2023 07:21PM
Quote
Tiangou
Quote
Smote
which one is that?

That Jews in Germany were cows or cowards and went willingly to the ovens without defending themselves as they could have if they didn't give up their guns.

Trivializing 6 million deaths to promote guns is really REALLY low. Doing so the way you're doing it is slimier than foot-fungus.

And that is an insult to foot fungus.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 07:51PM
Quote
Tiangou
Quote
Smote
which one is that?

That Jews in Germany were cows or cowards and went willingly to the ovens without defending themselves as they could have if they didn't give up their guns.

Trivializing 6 million deaths to promote guns is really REALLY low. Doing so the way you're doing it is slimier than foot-fungus.

they fought like hell when they had the chance. Look at the resistance in the Warsaw ghetto. Anyone who spends a few minutes looking can find that out.



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 19, 2023 08:27PM
Quote
Smote
Quote
Tiangou
Quote
Smote
which one is that?

That Jews in Germany were cows or cowards and went willingly to the ovens without defending themselves as they could have if they didn't give up their guns.

Trivializing 6 million deaths to promote guns is really REALLY low. Doing so the way you're doing it is slimier than foot-fungus.

they fought like hell when they had the chance. Look at the resistance in the Warsaw ghetto. Anyone who spends a few minutes looking can find that out.

Now you're pushing guns by proxy by celebrating the slaughter of the Warsaw ghetto.

How about just don't try to sell guns in a thread discussing atrocities.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Smote
Date: September 19, 2023 08:42PM
how am I celebrating the atrocities? I'm recognizing their strength and resolve, and denying the notion they just gave up and gave in.



Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 19, 2023 08:49PM
Quote
Smote
how am I celebrating the atrocities? I'm recognizing their strength and resolve, and denying the notion they just gave up and gave in.

I can't believe you're really this dense.

You are being incredibly offensive.

Seriously. Just. Stop.







Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2023 09:05PM by Tiangou.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Mr645
Date: September 20, 2023 07:13AM
The idea that Jews did not fight back against the Germans and their allies is false. Jews carried out acts of resistance in every German-occupied country and in the territories of Germany’s Axis partners. Against impossible odds, they resisted in ghettos, concentration camps, and killing centers. There were many factors that made resistance difficult, however, including a lack of weapons and resources, deception, fear, and the overwhelming power of the Germans and their collaborators.



"No Comment"
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Acer
Date: September 20, 2023 08:40AM
Again, it is faulty to assume the circumstances of the American Revolution obtain in every case where people are oppressed.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: $tevie
Date: September 20, 2023 09:52AM
Well, this thread hijack certainly distracted from the original point that Trump is a racist. Nice work, Pusskies.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Acer
Date: September 20, 2023 10:06AM
Every thread is a gun thread on MRF!
Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: Tiangou
Date: September 20, 2023 01:41PM
Mr645, you did not have to join your compatriot pushing guns on the backs of six million dead during the holiest week on the Jewish calendar.



Options:  Reply • Quote
Re: Our racist former president
Posted by: sekker
Date: September 20, 2023 10:29PM
Quote
$tevie
Well, this thread hijack certainly distracted from the original point that Trump is a racist. Nice work, Pusskies.

But no one needed new proof. He’s been a documented racist since this was being tracked at his earliest days in business.
Options:  Reply • Quote
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login

Online Users

Guests: 247
Record Number of Users: 186 on February 20, 2020
Record Number of Guests: 5122 on October 03, 2020