[www.msn.com]

"With the gag order on hold, Trump took to his Truth Social platform on Thursday morning and accused Engoron of criminally defrauding him and the state of New York. He also alleged that the judge's law clerk is "Politically Biased & Corrupt," writing that the clerk sits "by his side on the 'Bench' & tell him what to do."

Trump, in the same post, called President Joe Biden "crooked" and "all of the other Radical Left Lunatics, Communists, Fascists, Marxists, Democrats, & RINOS, who are seriously looking to DESTROY OUR COUNTRY."

no one wants too much of that crazy bottled up with all them biG Magas.

---

!#$@@$#!

Nolite manducare flavo.

Because ex-presidents and the wealthy-elite enjoy greater privileges than other people.

---

All that plus the pesky First Amendment.

It has to do with wanting to avoid a mistrial… which is the only possible goal of Trump’s attorneys. Who should all be censured for allowing and/or encouraging his insanity. Every single one of them should have removed themselves as his counsel once he started threatening the court.

but since EVERYONE is entitled council and a vigorous defense, how would all that work without violating his Civil Rights, and proving him correct that he was being targeted?

Someone HAS to represent him, unless he waives it.

---

"Defending your own life when in immediate danger to me is a basic right of each person. " Lemon Drop 11/17/2023 03:10 pm

Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) Private citizens have the right under the Second Amendment to possess an ordinary type of weapon and use it for lawful, historically established situations such as self-defense in a home, even when there is no relationship to a local militia.

"The conclusion is thus inescapable that the history, concept, and wording of the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as well as its interpretation by every major commentator and court in the first half-century after its ratification, indicates that what is protected is an individual right of a private citizen to own and carry firearms in a peaceful manner." Right to Keep and Bear Arms: Report of the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-seventh Congress, Second Session. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1982. Digitized September 30, 2008.

From the NYSRPA v Bruen "Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. . . . Despite the popularity of this two-step approach, it is one step too many. Step one of the predominant framework is broadly consistent with Heller, which demands a test rooted in the Second Amendment's text, as informed by history."

Quote
Smote
but since EVERYONE is entitled council and a vigorous defense, how would all that work without violating his Civil Rights, and proving him correct that he was being targeted?

You are entitled to an attorney in a criminal trial.

The case before Engoron is a civil matter.

---

Quote
Tiangou
Because ex-presidents and the wealthy-elite enjoy greater privileges than other people.

Nailed it.

---

Quote
$tevie

Quote
Tiangou
Because ex-presidents and the wealthy-elite enjoy greater privileges than other people.

Nailed it.

Thereby proving pAB45's assertion that there are, in fact, two systems of justice in the USA? Nice going. These GQP nuts continue to do a fantastic job of putting truth, freedom, democracy in lose/lose situations.

---

g=