"One of the more extraordinary suggestions is that a low yield, perhaps tactical, nuclear weapon will be exploded some distance out from a US port. Death and destruction will be minimized, but fear and hysteria will be maximized. Americans will be told that the ship bearing the weapon was discovered and intercepted just in time, thanks to Bush's illegal spying program, and that Iran is to blame. A more powerful wave of fear and outrage will again bind the American people to Bush, and the US media will not report the rest of the world's doubts of the explanation."
[www.smirkingchimp.com]

Bush was warned months before 9/11 that Al Qaeda was planning to hijack airliners but did nothing because the PNAC needed "another Pearl Harbor" to get Americans behind their planned generational war. Now they need another atrocity to keep us fearful and in line.

Those who say our government would never harm us to achieve their ends are ignorant of history.
[www.opednews.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/16/2006 10:41AM by Refurbvirgin.

Loki, put a sock in it and just dream dreams of that singer I posted in the other thread.

And I say this with friendship in may heart.

---

I watched a video called "911 Eyewitness - Learn the Truth" last night. I highly recommend it to anyone who believes the three WTC buildings were brought down by two airliners. This impossibility is explained scientifically.
Turn down your speakers:
[www.911eyewitness.com]

I don't dream of impossible things anymore, G'man, only those that are possible. (see above link)

And these are the kind of women I dream of now -

Wow -- my first thread where I have all the posters blocked.

---

It is what it is.

N-OS X-tasy! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Wow -- my first thread where I have all the
> posters blocked.

Most people only block those they have no interest in reading, so why did you even bother to open this thread, much less post to it? Were you only interested in reading any responses to my post?

You fulfill your own sig.

Loki,

a) Before I click on a thread, I am able to see the name of the person who started the thread only -- other posters are hidden from my view.

b) While most of what you post jere doesn't interest me in the least, the title for this thread was sufficiently intriguing that I chose to investigate further. It was only after doing so that the other posters to the thread were revealed to me.

c) Contrary to your last sentence, I would say that you are a perfect example of the meaning of my sig.

---

It is what it is.

'Just as long as you read Paul's article....

Bush is taking us down the road of endless war.